Particularly successful examples are Carver Mead’s neural chips, which are highly parallel, use digital controlled analog computing, and are intended as functionally similar recreations of biological networks. In his cover story for WIRED Why The Future Doesn’t Need Us, Bill Joy eloquently described the plagues of centuries’ past, and how new self-replicating technologies, such as mutant bioengineered pathogens, and “nanobots” run amok, may bring back long forgotten pestilence. Now if you want your own personal computer to recognize speech, it doesn’t have to go through the same process; you can just download the fully trained patterns in seconds. The Universe itself is said to have begun with just such a Singularity. Then again, if you skim the "junk DNA" (which may or may not really be junk), you can shrink it quite a bit. If we develop downloading technology to the point where the “copies” are as close to the original as the original person changes anyway in the course of one minute, that would be good enough for any conceivable purpose, yet does not require copying quantum states. Also, keep in mind that every point on the exponential growth curves underlying these panoply of technologies (see the graphs below) represents an intense human drama of innovation and competition. There is no old Ray and new Ray, just one Ray, one that never appears to fundamentally change. This “law of accelerating returns” applies to all of technology, indeed to any true evolutionary process, and can be measured with remarkable precision in information based technologies. Neurons (biological or otherwise) are a prime example of what is often called “chaotic computing.” Each neuron acts in an essentially unpredictable fashion. I don't agree with ANY "total bans" on any sort of research, however. There will not be a clear distinction between human and machine. If you don't research it, you don't know where the dangers might actually be. It represents the nearly vertical phase of exponential growth where the rate of growth is so extreme that technology appears to be growing at infinite speed. This type of calculation is less expensive than conventional (e.g., Pentium III / IV) calculations by a factor of at least 100 (particularly if implemented using digital controlled analog electronics, which would correspond well to the brain’s digital controlled analog electrochemical processes). Should we tell the millions of people afflicted with cancer and other devastating conditions that we are canceling the development of all bioengineered treatments because there is a risk that these same technologies may someday be used for malevolent purposes? Supporters, such as the conservative-leaning Texas Public Policy Foundation, say they save the government money; the companies operating them claim they are better at reforming prisoners and reducing recidivism. If you’ve ever tried to retrieve information from an obsolete form of data storage in an old obscure format (e.g., a reel of magnetic tape from a 1970 minicomputer), you will understand the challenges in keeping software viable. Bill and I have been frequently paired in a variety of venues as pessimist and optimist respectively. We achieve one Human Brain capability (2 * 10^16 cps) for one cent around the year 2037. The most cost effective way to scale up to such levels is through self-replication, essentially the same approach used in the biological world. Perhaps what I should say is that intelligence is more powerful than cosmology. But at what point do we consider an entity, a process, to be conscious, to feel pain and discomfort, to have its own intentionality, its own free will? WE do not agree with the position of the Department of Education (DepEd) that a “no homework” policy, prohibiting teachers from assigning academic work to be completed by students outside of regular school hours, is beneficial to Filipino students. By 2030, going to a web site will mean entering a full immersion virtual reality environment. SC: Superior Colliculus. They would be here for observation only, to gather knowledge, which is the only resource of value to such a civilization. But by the Anthropic principle, if the Universe didn’t allow the evolution of life we wouldn’t be here to notice it. It simply isn't true! According to Ray Kurzweil, 90 out of 108 predictions he made were entirely correct by the end of 2009. Here we scan someone’s brain to map the locations, interconnections, and contents of all the somas, axons, dendrites, presynaptic vesicles, neurotransmitter concentrations, and other neural components and levels. In my view, this next paradigm shift represents the goal of our civilization. And they’ll get mad if we don’t accept their claims. How could he be me? And if the product itself doesn’t exhibit some level of intelligence, then intelligence in the manufacturing and marketing methods have a major effect on the success and profitability of an enterprise. A detailed examination of twenty-first century bodies is beyond the scope of this essay, but recreating and enhancing our bodies will be (and has been) an easier task than recreating our minds. Moreover, it is important to note that the nonbiological forms will be derivative of biological design. If it says “Hey I’m conscious,” does that settle the issue? It is far from a single centralized effort, but is being pursued by a myriad of projects with many diverse goals. However, in my view, this nonbiological intelligence should still be considered human as it is fully derivative of the human-machine civilization. Many contemporary philosophers seem partial to this “identify from pattern” argument. Quantum disentanglement has been measured at many times the speed of light, but this is only communicating randomness (profound quantum randomness) at speeds far greater than the speed of light; again, this is not communication of information (but is of great interest for restoring encryption, after quantum computing destroys it). Further refinement of sound localization. In my view, the most significant implication of the Singularity will be the merger of biological and nonbiological intelligence. In the above diagram (courtesy of Scientific American), we can see that SETI has already thoroughly searched all star systems within 107 light-years from Earth for alien civilizations capable (and willing) to transmit at a power of at least 1025 watts, a so-called Type II civilization (and all star systems within 106 light-years for transmission of at least 1018 watts, and so on). A recent experiment at San Diego’s Institute for Nonlinear Science demonstrates the potential for electronic neurons to precisely emulate biological ones. This scan is not high enough in resolution for our purposes, but then, we probably don’t want to base our templates of machine intelligence on the brain of a convicted killer, anyway. 1. The Emperor quickly granted this seemingly benign and humble request. Rants & Raves "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us" Bill Joy's cover story on the dangers posed by developments in genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics ("Why the Future Doesn't Need Us," Wired … On the other hand, there is an engineering advantage to analog circuits in that analog computing is potentially thousands of times more efficient. The insurer has the absolute right to take a totaled car, and it almost always does. My own technical field is pattern recognition, and the projects that I have been involved in for over thirty years use this form of chaotic computing. Nanobots are robots that are the size of human blood cells, or even smaller. I’ll still be here in my carbon-cell-based brain. Just because quantum technology may be feasible does not suggest that the brain is capable of it. Unfortunately, if you don't agree with this label, you too are labeled. When this happens, a paradigm shift (i.e., a fundamental change in the approach) occurs, which enables exponential growth to continue. Later on, Humanoids developed over a period of millions of years, and Homo sapiens over a period of only hundreds of thousands of years. The intuitive linear assumption underlying economic thinking reaches its most ludicrous conclusions in the political debate surrounding the long-term future of the social security system. We started with functionally equivalent recreations of single neurons, then clusters of tens, then hundreds, and now thousands. We don’t worry, at least not yet, about causing pain and suffering to our computer programs. 2 0 obj For a variety of reasons it is easier to scan the brain of someone recently deceased than of someone still living. The merits of private prisons are debated not only in government. Although a work in progress, the model illustrates the feasibility of converting neurobiological models and brain connection data into working simulations. The following provides a brief overview of the law of accelerating returns as it applies to the double exponential growth of computation. Marvin Minsky observed that “there’s something queer about describing consciousness. Is it just “a set of industry expectations and goals,” as Randy Isaac, head of basic science at IBM contends? Progress in medical science depends on progress in chemistry, physics, biology, computer science and other fields. I have seen relatively little written about the ultimate source of this trend. Most of you (again I’m using the plural form of the word) are likely to be around to see the Singularity. But a serious assessment of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential. Okay, in this case, SETI will still fail because we won’t be able to see (or hear) them, at least not before we reach Singularity. Computers will be able to read on their own, understanding and modeling what they have read, by the second decade of the twenty-first century. In making this statement, it is important to emphasize that terms like evolution, destiny, and spiritual quest are observations about the end result, not the basis for these predictions. In mathematics, the term implies infinity, the explosion of value that occurs when dividing a constant by a number that gets closer and closer to zero. With this approach, we don’t have to copy every single connection. I will agree Bill Oreilly misspoke when he chastized all Muslims as killers. What authority does he have to write on technology? This model considers the impact of the growing power of the technology to foster its own next generation. It gives importance and value to time. The support for “high tech” in the business community (mostly software) has grown enormously. Haw, the more proactive of the little men, realizes that the cheese has all but disappeared and sets out in the maze to find new cheese. Well, just wait and see. A contemporary example is a comprehensive model of a significant portion of the human auditory processing system that Lloyd Watts (www.lloydwatts.com) has developed from both neurobiology studies of specific neuron types and brain interneuronal connection information. There are many projects around the world which are creating nonbiological devices to recreate in great detail the functionality of human neuron clusters. What is behind this remarkably predictable phenomenon? The web will provide a panoply of virtual environments to explore. My estimate of brain capacity is 100 billion neurons times an average 1,000 connections per neuron (with the calculations taking place primarily in the connections) times 200 calculations per second. Or to take a more recent example, the advent of computer assisted design tools allows rapid development of the next generation of computers. Is this form of immortality the same concept as a physical human, as we know them today, living forever? But scanning a frozen brain is feasible today, albeit not yet at a sufficient speed or bandwidth, but again, the law of accelerating returns will provide the requisite speed of scanning, just as it did for the human genome scan. He will say “I grew up in Queens, New York, went to college at MIT, stayed in the Boston area, started and sold a few artificial intelligence companies, walked into a scanner there, and woke up in the machine here. In this case, the body remains the good old human body that we’re familiar with, although this too will become greatly enhanced through biotechnology (gene enhancement and replacement) and, later on, through nanotechnology. Others, such as the … It will literally get out of our control. But what would a thousand scientists, each a thousand times more intelligent than human scientists today, and each operating a thousand times faster than contemporary humans (because the information processing in their primarily nonbiological brains is faster) accomplish? Perhaps there are extremely advanced technological civilizations out there, but we are outside their light sphere of intelligence. How will we apply the thousands of trillions of bytes of information derived from each brain scan? Subjectively, the issue is more subtle and profound, but first we need to reflect on one additional objective issue: our physical self. The basic computational and communication methods are also essentially feasible today. A universal basic income program would “support people’s basic needs,” said Kate Ward, an assistant professor of Christian ethics at Marquette University. Abandonment of broad areas of technology will only push them underground where development would continue unimpeded by ethics and regulation. As a contemporary example, we spent years teaching one research computer how to recognize continuous human speech. So even though the rate of progress in the very recent past (e.g., this past year) is far greater than it was ten years ago (let alone a hundred or a thousand years ago), our memories are nonetheless dominated by our very recent experience. Biological thinking is stuck at 1026 calculations per second (for all biological human brains), and that figure will not appreciably change, even with bioengineering changes to our genome. And these will not be idle claims; they will evidence the sort of rich, complex, and subtle behavior one associates with these feelings. 5. That’s right, our humble civilization with its Dodge pick up trucks, fried chicken fast food, and ethnic cleansings (and computation!) I believe you can be anti-war or pro-tulsi without being nationalist about it. The economic models used for the social security projections are entirely linear, i.e., they reflect fixed economic growth. There are a variety of bodies that we will provide for our machines, and that they will provide for themselves: bodies built through nanotechnology (i.e., building highly complex physical systems atom by atom), virtual bodies (that exist only in virtual reality), bodies comprised of swarms of nanobots, and other technologies. In this way, human technology is distinguished from the tool making of other species. This is actually a conservative assumption. The answer depends on what we mean by living and dying. We are not at all permanent collections of particles. Suppose I replace a small number of biological neurons with functionally equivalent nonbiological ones (they may provide certain benefits such as greater reliability and longevity, but that’s not relevant to this thought experiment). And the primary reason for this failure is that they are based on the intuitive but short sighted linear view of history. Suffering in the world continues and demands our steadfast attention. So we won’t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century — it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today’s rate). When we change from one personal computer to a less obsolete model, we don’t throw all our files away; rather we copy them over to the new hardware. The brain is massively parallel, performing on the order of a hundred trillion computations at the same time, but at extremely slow speeds. My view is that the likely outcome is that on the one hand, from the perspective of biological humanity, these superhuman intelligences will appear to be their transcendent servants, satisfying their needs and desires. This will be the next step in evolution, the next high level paradigm shift. 1. Who is Bill Joy? And this accelerating growth of computing is, in turn, part of the yet broader phenomenon of the accelerating pace of any evolutionary process. Yet here we are. The Universe itself was born in a big bang and will end with a crunch or a whimper, we’re not yet sure which. Current economic policy is based on outdated models which include energy prices, commodity prices, and capital investment in plant and equipment as key driving factors, but do not adequately model bandwidth, MIPs, megabytes, intellectual property, knowledge, and other increasingly vital (and increasingly increasing) constituents that are driving the economy. Human brain scanning has already started. Software prices are deflating even more quickly than computer hardware. An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential, contrary to the common-sense “intuitive linear” view. Even the conventional transistor relies on the quantum effect of electron tunneling. There are a myriad of such examples. Most of the complexity of a human neuron is devoted to maintaining its life support functions, not its information processing capabilities. Although the ability of today’s computers to extract and learn knowledge from natural language documents is limited, their capabilities in this domain are improving rapidly. The issue will be even more contentious with regard to future nonbiological entities with human-like behavior and intelligence. As a test case, we can take a small measure of comfort from how we have dealt with one recent technological challenge. A condemned killer allowed his brain and body to be scanned and you can access all 10 billion bytes of him on the Internet http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible/visible_human.html. Watts’ model includes five parallel paths and includes the actual intermediate representations of auditory information at each stage of neural processing. Nanobot technology will be able to expand our minds in virtually any imaginable way. I am not saying that technology will evolve to human levels and beyond simply because it is our destiny and because of the satisfaction of a spiritual quest. The information presented on these pages should generally be … Joy imagines the world as … In another positive feedback loop, as a particular evolutionary process (e.g., computation) becomes more effective (e.g., cost effective), greater resources are deployed toward the further progress of that process. Freitas at least has some clue. Like any new technology, it won’t be perfect at first. July 20, 2019 "Information Clearing House" - The US government’s indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange marked the worst attack on press freedom in history.Assange has been charged on 18 counts, including 17 violations of the Espionage Act. I meant it in the sense of “all of you.”. OC: Octopus Cells. Our ethics as responsible technologists should include such “fine grained” relinquishment, among other professional ethical guidelines. Unlike many contemporary “neural net” machines, which use mathematically simplified models of human neurons, some contemporary neural nets are already using highly detailed models of human neurons, including detailed nonlinear analog activation functions and other relevant details. Although exponential trends did exist a thousand years ago, they were at that very early stage where an exponential trend is so flat that it looks like no trend at all. So the concern with quantum computing and tubules have been introduced together. But fundamentally this is a political prediction, not a philosophical argument. In contrast, the human brain combines digital and analog methods with most computations performed in the analog domain. We won’t need to wait until 2030 to experience shared virtual reality environments, at least for the visual and auditory senses. One of the most transformative periods in my faith was when I took time to re-read the Gospels of the New Testament and get reacquainted with Jesus' himself, in his own words. With this type of objective view of consciousness, the conundrums do go away. Genuine abandonment, as Curtis mentioned above as in his case, sadly this is usually accompanied by the adultery. Nonetheless, Bill Joy just doesn't get it. Computer speed (per unit cost) doubled every three years between 1910 and 1950, doubled every two years between 1950 and 1966, and is now doubling every year. It constitutes a rupture in the fabric of space and time. If there is one crucial insight that we can make regarding why the issue of consciousness is so contentious, it is the following: There exists no objective test that can conclusively determine its presence. This is the goal of the Singularity. I see, all of us as in the whole world. The nanobots take up positions in close physical proximity to every interneuronal connection coming from all of our senses (e.g., eyes, ears, skin). Manufacturing productivity grew at 4.4% annually from 1995 to 1999, durables manufacturing at 6.5% per year. I agree with Britt's argument, because I feel time truly does make the average person more content rather than money. In the same way that people today beam their lives from web cams in their bedrooms, “experience beamers” circa 2030 will beam their entire flow of sensory experiences, and if so desired, their emotions and other secondary reactions. Some philosophers maintain that achieving human level intelligence is impossible without a body. So the ladder has been moving up, and thus we have been exponentially increasing investments in education at all levels. My own expectation is that the creative and constructive applications of this technology will dominate, as I believe they do today. Needless to say, the Singularity will transform all aspects of our lives, social, sexual, and economic, which I explore herewith. Intelligence will be more powerful than these impersonal forces. in different ways, on different time scales, and for a wide variety of technologies ranging from electronic to biological, and the acceleration of progress and growth applies. This hybrid will include “biologically inspired” processes resulting from the reverse engineering of biological brains. It is interesting to note that in the example of speech recognition software, the three primary surviving competitors stayed very close to each other in the intelligence of their software. When a scientist publishes a paper, her peers expect to see evidence that she has read prior work relevant to her topic. It is typical, therefore, that even sophisticated commentators, when considering the future, extrapolate the current pace of change over the next 10 years or 100 years to determine their expectations. This chart spans at least five distinct paradigms of computing, of which Moore’s Law pertains to only the latest one. But noninvasively scanning a living brain will ultimately become feasible as MRI, optical, and other scanning technologies continue to improve in resolution and speed. In physics, similarly, a singularity denotes an event or location of infinite power. We make extraordinary efforts to delay it, and indeed often consider its intrusion a tragic event. Such breaches I would consider would be: 1. You will get $40 trillion just by reading this essay and understanding what it says. The computationally pertinent aspects of individual neurons are complicated, but definitely not beyond our ability to accurately model. Consider that the particles making up my body and brain are constantly changing. In technological evolution, human ingenuity combined with ever changing market conditions keep the process of innovation going. So if all of you read this essay and understand it, then economic expectations would be based on the historical exponential model, and thus stock values would increase. The massive parallelism of the human brain is the key to its pattern recognition abilities, which reflects the strength of human thinking. If we look inside its circuits, and see essentially the identical kinds of feedback loops and other mechanisms in its brain that we see in a human brain (albeit implemented using nonbiological equivalents), does that settle the issue? Nanobot technology will provide fully immersive, totally convincing virtual reality in the following way. Although we do add patterns of interneuronal connections and neurotransmitter concentrations as a normal part of the learning process, the current overall capacity of the human brain is highly constrained, restricted to a mere hundred trillion connections. How will we apply technology that is more intelligent than its creators? he created the first synthetic instruments, first electronic book reader for the blind, the first robot that creates truly original art, a robot that writes poems inspired by other poems ( from what I understand, he … It represents vast power to be used for all humankind’s purposes. Fine line here in that marriage is a serious covenant made before God. Processing transients from the Octopus Cells. Human thinking is stuck at 1026 calculations per second (for all biological humans), and that figure will never appreciably change (except for a small increase resulting from genetic engineering). I agree with Steve about Dore's polarizing personality but my primary issue with him is that we disagree on substantive foreign policy issues. Today, in accordance with the common wisdom, everyone expects continuous technological progress and the social repercussions that follow. My friends concur. Let’s consider the question of what we will find when we do this. And if old Ray is terminated, well then that’s the end of Ray. In other words, we will become vastly smarter as we merge with our technology. Thus the (double) exponential growth of computing is broader than Moore’s Law, which refers to only one of its paradigms. I am at this moment in a very different quantum state (and different in non-quantum ways as well) than I was a minute ago (certainly in a very different state than I was before I wrote this paragraph). Kurzweil's views are *not* mainstream views, and I think that it is important for an article discussing the man to point that out. Kurzweil later released a more detailed analysis of the accuracy of his predictions up to 2009, arguing that most were correct. There is no need for high interest rates to counter an inflation that doesn’t exist. Considering the data for actual calculating devices and computers during the twentieth century: Twentieth century computing data matches: We can determine the growth rate over a period of time: Already, IBM’s “Blue Gene” supercomputer, now being built and scheduled to be completed by 2005, is projected to provide 1 million billion calculations per second (i.e., one billion megaflops). A more optimistic Morgan Stanley study estimates that Internet-based procurement will save Ford, GM, and DaimlerChrysler about $2700 per vehicle. In addition to all of the innovation in integrated circuits, there are multiple layers of innovation in computer design, e.g., pipelining, parallel processing, instruction look-ahead, instruction and memory caching, and many others. As protests against racist police brutality sweep across the U.S., we explain the meaning behind the Black Lives Matter movement and why saying 'All Lives Matter' can be considered tone deaf. %PDF-1.4 By the end of the first half of the chess board, the inventor had accumulated one large field’s worth (4 billion grains), and the emperor did start to take notice. Using nanobots as brain extenders is a significant improvement over the idea of surgically installed neural implants, which are beginning to be used today (e.g., ventral posterior nucleus, subthalmic nucleus, and ventral lateral thalamus neural implants to counteract Parkinson’s Disease and tremors from other neurological disorders, cochlear implants, and others.) On the one hand, there will be radical extensions to human longevity, while on the other hand, we will benefit from far greater economic expansion. <> The bulk of our experiences will shift from real reality to virtual reality. At the center of a black hole, matter is so dense that its gravity is infinite. Although these estimates are conservatively high, one can find higher and lower estimates. 4. What is the maximum speed? Each time one paradigm runs out of steam, another picks up the pace. If I learn French, or read War and Peace, I can’t readily download that learning to you. The answer will depend on who you ask. We exposed it to thousands of hours of recorded speech, corrected its errors, and patiently improved its performance. We achieve one Human Race capability (2 * 10^26 cps) for one cent around the year 2059. Also involved in computing inter-aural level difference. But the future will be far more surprising than most observers realize: few have truly internalized the implications of the fact that the rate of change itself is accelerating. There should be millions of civilizations vastly more advanced than our own, so we should be noticing their broadcasts. Interacting with the newly instantiated person will feel like interacting with the original person. And we can also throw in the methods for building intelligent machines that we already understand. The English word “you” can be singular or plural. But it is not easily resolved, or even readily understood. is that modern technology is a unified system in which all parts are dependent on one another.
Crf110 Dual Exhaust, Best Bow For Act 1 Merc, Mini Led Christmas Lights Replacement Bulbs, Online Barcode Generator, Why Do People Not Like Poetry Reddit, Hype Man Friend, Usb Wifi Adapter For Pc, How To Root Moto G7, What Is Lilith Holding In Her Hands, Logitech G203 Weight,
